The dynamics of congruent and conflicting perceptions in the South China Sea region—and their repercussions—warrant examination.

the international and political journal

Authors

  • Adnan Rahman Ibrahim
  • Ali Faris Hamid

Abstract

The South China Sea constitutes a highly complex geopolitical space among the international actors within it. This complexity stems, in part, from China’s cumulative "geo-developmental" projects—such as the construction of islands, ports, and a "digital silk road"—which create structural dependency. These initiatives are coupled with a diplomatic approach that favors exclusive bilateralism for conflict resolution, alongside civilizational narratives designed to "humanize" China’s historical claims—all with the ultimate goal of establishing control over the sea. Conversely, regional states face the dilemma of "violated sovereignty," as their overlapping claims lead to on-the-ground competition for resources. This dynamic undermines the effectiveness of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in serving the interests of all its members, and complicates the drafting and implementation of a binding code of conduct. This crisis-ridden environment has triggered an intense strategic scramble among regional and international powers, which are leveraging security and economic cooperation—as well as military alliances—to implement deterrence and protect their supply lines. This process has effectively led to the "securitized internationalization" of the region, aimed at curbing China’s ambitions as a revisionist power

References

He, Alex.2019. "The Belt and Road Initiative: Motivations, Financing, Expansion and Challenges of Xi's Ever-expanding Strategy" CIGI Papers. No. 225 (Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/no.225.pdf

World Bank,2019. "Belt and Road Economics: Opportunities and Risks of Transport Corridors". (Washington). https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/715511560787699851/pdf/Main-Report.pdf

Nouwens, Veerle.2019. "China's 21st Century Maritime Silk Road: Implications for the UK". RUSI Occasional Paper. Royal United Services Institute. (February), https://static.rusi.org/20190214_nouwens_maritime_silk_road_web.pdf

Rolland, Nadège.2017. "China's Eurasian Century? Political and Strategic Implications of the Belt and Road Initiative" National Bureau of Asian Research. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321889820_China's_eurasian_century_Political_and_strategic_implications_of_the_belt_and_road_initiative

Callahan, William A. 2016. "China's 'Asia Dream': The Belt Road Initiative and the New Regional Order," Asian Journal of Comparative Politics 1, no. 3 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307874526_China%27s_Asia_Dream_The_Belt_Road_Initiative_and_the_New_Regional_Order

Sacks, Benjamin J. 2022. The Political Geography of the South China Sea Disputes. RAND Research Primer. https://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/perspectives/PEA2000/PEA2021-1/RAND_PEA2021-1.pdf

Emmers, Ralf. 2014. "ASEAN's Search for Neutrality in the South China Sea," Asian Journal of Peacebuilding 2, no 1.https://ipus.snu.ac.kr/eng/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2017/11/04_Ralf-Emmers_DOI.pdf

Langer, Lorenz.2018. "The South China Sea as a Challenge to International Law and to International Legal Scholarship". Berkeley Journal of International Law 36, no. 3 .https://lawcat.berkeley.edu/record/1128485/files/fulltext.pdf

Danielsen, Eric C.2015. Imbalanced Strategy: Confronting China in the South China Sea. Quantico: Marine Corps University, Command and Staff College. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/AD1175842.pdf

Roszko, Edyta. 2024. "Heritagising the South China Sea: Appropriation and Dispossession in Tanmen, Hainan," Journal of Heritage Studies 30, no2.https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11017968/

Mayer, Hanno. 2024. "Tianxia Under the Sea: China's Quest for Maritime History" Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 53, no.2.https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/18681026241283070

Maude, Richard and Fraser, Dominique.2022. Chinese Diplomacy in Southeast Asia During the COVID-19 Pandemic. New York: Asia Society Policy Institute.https://asiasociety.org/sites/default/files/2022-07/Chinese%20Diplomacy%20in%20Southeast%20Asia%20During%20the%20Pandemic.pdf

Hwang, Edward F. 2008. China's Soft Power and Growing Influence in Southeast Asia. Monterey: Naval Postgraduate School. https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA479916.pdf

Hong, Nong 2022. The Future of the South China Sea: Disputes and Negotiations. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/109716/1/9780472905379.pdf

Schofield, Clive and Storey, Ian.2009. The South China Sea Dispute: Increasing Stakes and Rising Tensions. Washington. Jamestown Foundation. https://jamestown.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/The_South_China_Sea_Dispute.pdf

Batongbacal, Jay. 2020. "The Philippines and the South China Sea: Legal Strategies and Political Outcomes". Asian Politics and Policy 12, no.4 .

Thi Lan Anh, Nguyen.2023. "Vietnam's South China Sea Policy: Balancing Sovereignty and Economic Engagement" ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute Perspective, No.79. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/ISEAS_Perspective_2023_79.pdf

Davenport, Tara.2011. "The Spratly Islands Dispute and the Limits of International Law". Asian Journal of International Law 1, no1 https://doi.org/10.1017/S2044251310000135

Laksmana, Evan.2020. "Indonesia's Natuna Confrontation and the Future of ASEAN's South China Sea Diplomacy" ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute Perspective, No. 10 (January): 2. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/ISEAS_Perspective_2020_10.pdf

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).2022. "The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2022".roma. 14–16. https://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/cc0461en

World Resources Institute (WRI).2012. "Reefs at Risk Revisited in the Coral Triangle". Washington. 3–5. https://www.wri.org/research/reefs-risk-revisited-coral-triangle

Batongbacal, Jay.2021. "The Philippines and the South China Sea arbitration award: external appeasement and internal dissection". Iseas perspective, no126 .558.

Vietnam Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (MARD)2023. Fisheries Sector Annual Report 2022 .Hanoi.3.

Schofield, Clive and Storey, Ian.2018. The South China Sea Dispute.

Currie, Duncan E.J. 2018. "Deep Seabed Mining and the South China Sea" Ocean & Coastal Management no.163. 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.06.012

ASEAN Secretariat, 2023. ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2023. Jakarta: 150–153. https://www.aseanstats.org/publication/asyb_2023/

Batongbacal, Jay.2015. "The Philippines-Indonesia Maritime Boundary" Asian Journal of International Law 5 .285–295.

Djalal, Hasjim and Townsend-Gault, Ian.1999. Managing Potential Conflicts in the South China Sea: Informal Diplomacy for Conflict Prevention. Washington. United States Institute of Peace. 109–133,https://www.usip.org/publications/1999/01/herding-cats

Schofield, Clive and Ian Storey.2009. The South China Sea Dispute: increasing stakes and rising tensions. Washington. The Jamestown foundation.

Nguyen, Thi Lan Anh. "Vietnam's South China Sea Policy," p. 5.

Storey, Ian.2014. "ASEAN’s Failure in the South China Sea," in The South China Sea Maritime Dispute: Political, Legal and Regional Perspectives, ed. Leszek Buszynski and Christopher B. Roberts. London. 122–126. https://www.routledge.com/The-South-China-Sea-Maritime- Dispute-Political-Legal-and-Regional/Buszynski-Roberts/p/book/9781138851429

Permanent Court of Arbitration, The Republic of the Philippines v. The People's Republic of China, Award, PCA Case No. 2013-19 (The Hague: PCA, July 12, 2016), paras. 278, 622.

Castro, Renato Cruz de. 2016. "The Philippines in the South China Sea Dispute: Legal Strategy and Diplomatic Outcome," Contemporary Southeast Asia 38, no. 3. 400–406. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs38-3b

Thayer, Carlyle. 2012. "ASEAN's Code of Conduct in the South China Sea: A Litmus Test for Community Building?" The Asia-Pacific Journal 10, no 34. https://apjjf.org/2012/10/34/Carlyle-A.-Thayer/3813/article.html

Lin, Joanne and Hoang Thi Ha.2021. "ASEAN and the South China Sea: Deepening Divisions". ISEAS Perspective No. 59 (Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.3–4. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2021-59/

Storey, Ian.2020 "The South China Sea Code of Conduct: Is Real Progress Possible" ISEAS Perspective No. 83 .Singapore. ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute, 2–3. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2020-83/

Vietnam Ministry of Foreign Affairs, "Statement by Minister of Foreign Affairs Bui Thanh Son at the ASEAN Summit," May 2023; cited in ASEAN Secretariat, ASEAN Annual Report 2022–2023 (Jakarta: ASEAN Secretariat, 2023), p. 44.

Regional Cooperation Agreement on Combating Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia (ReCAAP), Annual Report 2023 (Singapore: ReCAAP ISC, 2024), p. 7. https://www.recaap.org/resources/ck/files/reports/annual/ReCAAP_Annual_Report_2023.pdf

Banlaoi, Rommel. 2019. "Maritime Security in Southeast Asia: The Trilateral Cooperative Arrangement," Journal of Asian and African Studies 54, no.5 .650–655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909619836494

Joanne, Lin. 2022. "ASEAN's South China Sea Diplomacy: Ambiguity or Paralysis?" ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute Perspective, No. 15. 4–6. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2022-15/

The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, "What the Indo-Pacific means to Europe Trade Value, Chokepoints, and Security Risks," HCSS . 15

Adam, J.F. 2021. "Analyzing the Causes and Effects of the South China Sea Dispute," The Journal of Territorial and Maritime Studies 8, no.2. 45 .

National Maritime Foundation,2021. "India's Engagement in the South China Sea," NMF.

Department of Defense, 2023. "ROK–U.S.–Japan Operational Security Cooperation for Responding to a Two-Front Crisis". 483

SCSPI, 2023. South China Sea Strategic Situation Probing Initiative, "US Maritime Strategy and the South China Sea,". 13.

HCSS, The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, 2024. "Reshaping the international legal order: China's strategic use of lawfare and lessons learned for Europe,". 20.

Paparo, Samuel J.2025. Statement of Admiral Samuel J. Paparo, Commander, U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, USINDOPACOM. 3.

ASEAN, 2024. "ASEAN Regional Forum Annual Security Outlook 2024," 276.

Army University Press,2024. "Military Review May-June 2024," Professional Bulletin. 10.

The National Institute for Defense Studies (NIDS), 2021. "East Asian Strategic Review2024 .177.

Institute of International Affairs, 2022. "Japan's multi-layered security strategy: Deterrence, coalition-building and economic security," 236.

National Defence Strategy, Department of Defence, 2024, Australian Government .13.

The Asan Forum,2023. "South Korea's Policy Responses to a PRC Maritime Blockade of Taiwan". 333

National Maritime Foundation, NMF.2021. "India's Engagement in the South China Sea" .209

The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies , (HCSS)2021, "Mixed Messages and the EU's Indo-Pacific Strategy". 278

European External Action Service EEAS,2021. "Coordinated Maritime Presences". 143.

The International Institute for Strategic Studies, 2021. "The UK Indo-Pacific Tilt: Defence and Military Implications". 396

Nghiem H.T., 2025."Basic aspects of security cooperation between Vietnam and Russia in the 21st century: current situation and prospects," The Russian Journal of Vietnamese Studies. 3.

Gulf Research Center,2024. "GULF RESEARCH CENTER ANNUAL STRATEGIC SURVEY 2024" 192-194.

Additional Files

Published

2026-11-15

How to Cite

Ibrahim, A. R. . . . . . . . . . . . ., & Hamid, A. F. . (2026). The dynamics of congruent and conflicting perceptions in the South China Sea region—and their repercussions—warrant examination.: the international and political journal . The International and Political Journal, (68), 829–864. Retrieved from https://ipj.uomustansiriyah.edu.iq/index.php/political/article/view/584